... is full of shit!


This is a perfect example of how the media obscures important truths with unimportant facts. The following is from The Times -by Douglas Jehl:

"There is no doubt that Saddam was a threat to our nation, and there is no doubt that he had W.M.D. capability, and the Duelfer report is very clear on these points,'' said James Wilkinson, a White House deputy national security adviser, using the abbreviation for weapons of mass destruction.

Gee, like we don't know what WMD stands for?!!*#$. No wonder people read the NY Post.

I don't mean to sound like the Daily Howler but The Times seems to think that adherence to an Amish-like orthodoxy will somehow restore the credibility it lost due to the Jayson Blair scandal. They're also pretrified of being Rathered, which is the journalistic equivalent of being rogered roundly.